Showing posts with label Need help of a Virginia lawyer for a divorce in VA? Call 888-437-7747. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Need help of a Virginia lawyer for a divorce in VA? Call 888-437-7747. Show all posts
Sunday, April 27, 2014

Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Cruelty Desertion

If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.  Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Stone v. Stone
Facts:

            Plaintiff wife filed a bill of complaint requesting a divorce on the basis of defendant husband's cruelty, desertion, and abandonment. In a cross-bill, the husband asked that he be granted a divorce on the ground of wife's willful desertion or abandonment. The Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia) granted the wife's complaint for divorce, distributed property, and denied spousal support for the husband. The husband appealed.

            If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • The main purpose of requiring timely specific objections is to afford the trial court an opportunity to rule intelligently on the issues presented, thus avoiding unnecessary appeals and reversals. When such specific objections have not been made, the appellate court will not consider an argument on appeal which was not presented to the trial court.
  • If a party fails to obtain a ruling, there is no ruling for an appellate court to review. Therefore, Va. Sup. Ct. R. 5A:18 bars consideration of a question on appeal that was not ruled upon.
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Friday, April 25, 2014

Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Desertion Spousal Support

If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.  Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Love v. Love
Facts:

            Appellant ex-husband challenged a judgment of the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia), which granted appellee ex-wife a final divorce on the ground that the parties lived separate and apart for one year, refused to grant appellant a divorce on the ground of desertion, and awarded appellee spousal support and attorney fees.

            If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • In Virginia , a single act of physical cruelty will constitute grounds for divorce if it is so severe and atrocious as to endanger life, if it indicates an intention to do serious bodily harm, if it causes reasonable apprehension of serious danger in the future, or if the precedent or attendant circumstances show that the acts are likely to be repeated.
  • Misconduct in the form of cruelty occurring while divorcing parties are living separate and apart may constitute grounds of divorce.
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Thursday, April 24, 2014

Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Desertion Spousal Support

If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.  Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Anderson v. Anderson

Facts:

            Appellant husband sought review of the judgment by the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia), which rejected the commissioner's finding that appellee wife was guilty of desertion and was not entitled to spousal support, granted appellee spousal support and attorney's fees, and granted appellee a no-fault divorce.

            If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • The general rule is that one spouse is not justified in leaving the other, unless the conduct of the other is sufficient to establish the foundation of judicial proceeding for a divorce. Although this rule has been relaxed, one spouse is not legally justified in leaving the other merely because there has been a gradual breakdown in the marital relationship.
  • The absenting of one spouse from the other after the institution and during the pendency of a suit for divorce is not desertion in law; however the rule should never be applied when it appears that the suit for divorce turns out to be frivolous, a mere sham.
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Lived Separate

If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.  Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Freeman v. Freeman

Facts:

            Plaintiff wife filed for divorce from defendant husband in Prince William. As grounds for the divorce, the wife stated that the parties had lived separate and apart from each other without any cohabitation and without interruption, although remaining within the same house. During such time, it was the intention of at least one of the parties that the separation be permanent; and, there was no possibility of a reconciliation between the parties.

            If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • A divorce based on one year separation does not require any evidence regarding the nature of the marital relationship. The legislature enacted Va. Code Ann. § 20-91(9) to permit the granting of a divorce to either spouse regardless of fault and without any inquiry into the quality of the relationship, when the parties have lived separate and apart for the required period. Living separate and apart requires more than mere physical separation. The act of physically separating must be coupled with the intent to end the marriage at the time of the separation. But physical separation is required before the court can even look at the intent of the parties at the time of the separation.
  • A divorce based on living separate and apart for one year requires that the parties physically separate their lives. Without that physical act, the court cannot look to the intent of the parties to end the marriage. Fault-based grounds for divorce exist if the parties desire for the court to examine the nature of the marital relationship. But one of the purposes behind enacting a ground for divorce based on separation for the prescribed length of time is to avoid such an intrusion and rely on the act of physically separating as proof of the demise of the marriage. To avoid the risk of collusion between the parties, the separation must be clearly established and corroborated by both witness testimony and the circumstances surrounding the separation.
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Alimony Settlement Agreement

If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.  Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Sam v. Sam

Facts:

            A husband was obligated to pay alimony to his wife under a settlement agreement that was incorporated in a decree of divorce a mensa et thoro in Prince William. He subsequently filed a bill of complaint that sought a divorce a vinculo matrimonii because of the wife's adultery and to set aside the prior decree's alimony provisions on the grounds of fraud, coercion, and duress. The trial court sustained the wife's demurrer to the bill and dismissed the suit. On appeal, the court reversed and remanded. Because the decree a mensa et thoro granted a legal separation but did not sever the marital bond, it was not a final adjudication of support rights and the trial court had jurisdiction to modify the decree's alimony provisions to meet changed conditions, including the power to revoke the provisions if subsequent to the decree the wife forfeited her right to support through misconduct. The first decree, which was entered on the ground of the husband's desertion, barred a later divorce suit on the ground of adultery. The husband was estopped from avoiding the agreement's property settlement provisions because he had not acted promptly and could not escape the agreement's burdens but keep its benefits.

            If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • A decree judicially establishing the husband's desertion and granting to the wife a divorce a mensa et thoro on the grounds of desertion is a bar to a suit for divorce a vinculo brought by the husband for adultery committed after the entry of the decree a mensa et thoro. The marital status is not affected by a decree of legal separation, that is, a divorce a mensa et thoro; and where the wife has been forced by her husband's misconduct to seek a decree of separation, there still continues the duty, arising out of the marital status, to provide his wife with a reasonably sufficient support considering his circumstances and her needs at any given time, provided her right to support has not been forfeited by her misconduct, which forfeiture may be for misconduct prior to the decree for separation or subsequent to the entry of such decree.
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Sunday, April 20, 2014

Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Alimony Settlement Agreement

If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.  Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Elvis v. Elvis
Facts:

            A husband was obligated to pay alimony to his wife under a settlement agreement that was incorporated in a decree of divorce a mensa et thoro in Prince William. He subsequently filed a bill of complaint that sought a divorce a vinculo matrimonii because of the wife's adultery and to set aside the prior decree's alimony provisions on the grounds of fraud, coercion, and duress. The trial court sustained the wife's demurrer to the bill and dismissed the suit. On appeal, the court reversed and remanded. Because the decree a mensa et thoro granted a legal separation but did not sever the marital bond, it was not a final adjudication of support rights and the trial court had jurisdiction to modify the decree's alimony provisions to meet changed conditions, including the power to revoke the provisions if subsequent to the decree the wife forfeited her right to support through misconduct. The first decree, which was entered on the ground of the husband's desertion, barred a later divorce suit on the ground of adultery. The husband was estopped from avoiding the agreement's property settlement provisions because he had not acted promptly and could not escape the agreement's burdens but keep its benefits.

            If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • The marital status is not affected by a decree of legal separation, that is, a divorce a mensa et thoro; and where the wife has been forced by her husband's misconduct to seek a decree of separation, there still continues the duty, arising out of the marital status, to provide his wife with a reasonably sufficient support considering his circumstances and her needs at any given time, provided her right to support has not been forfeited by her misconduct, which forfeiture may be for misconduct prior to the decree for separation or subsequent to the entry of such decree.
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Thursday, April 17, 2014

Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Custody Visitation

If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.  Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Franco v. Franco

Facts:

            Appellant wife challenged a judgment of the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia), which denied the wife's prayer for a divorce from appellee husband, granted the husband a divorce a mensa, and awarded custody of the parties' son to the husband with visitation awarded to the wife.

            If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • One spouse is not guilty of legal desertion in separating from the other after the institution of a suit for divorce or during its pendency. Va. Code Ann. § 20-95 authorizes a decree of divorce from bed and board for cruelty, reasonable apprehension of bodily hurt, willful desertion or abandonment. In reality, there are only two grounds for a divorce from bed and board, desertion and cruelty, because cruelty and reasonable apprehension of bodily hurt are so closely related in the matter of proof and effect.
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Cruelty Desertion

If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.  Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Materdo v. Materdo
Facts:

            Plaintiff wife appealed from a decree entered by the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia) in favor of defendant husband in a suit for divorce, and for counsel fees and alimony, brought by the wife on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. The decree appealed from denied the divorce, but awarded the wife support and counsel fees.

            If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • Desertion is a breach of matrimonial duty, and is composed first, of the actual breaking off of the matrimonial cohabitation, and, secondly, an intent to desert in the mind of the offender. Both must combine to make the desertion complete. The intent to desert is usually the principal thing to be considered. Obviously a mere separation by mutual consent is not desertion in either. Nor, as a matter of proof, can desertion be inferred against either from the mere unaided fact that they do not live together, though protracted absence, with other circumstances, may establish the original intent. The courts have not laid down any particular rules of evidence for determining whether a separation does or does not, as matter of proof, amount to desertion; and the question does not admit of such rules, but each case must rest on its own circumstances.
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Tuesday, April 15, 2014

Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Desertion Cruelty

If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.  Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Keith v. Keith

Facts:

            The wife sought a divorce on the ground of her husband's cruelty in Prince William. The court ruled that, under all the circumstances, in view of his wife's conduct, the husband was not guilty of such cruelty as would justify desertion by her. The trial court found that there was no just cause for the desertion and that the husband was entitled to a decree on this ground. The court concurred in this conclusion. The court noted that the question as to whether the wife could be held guilty of a wilful desertion such as would entitle the husband to a divorce on the ground of desertion, in view of a separation agreement between the parties, was a close one. The agreement recited that the parties had mutually agreed to separate and live apart. The court decided that the contract, while recognizing that the parties had agreed to live apart, was entered into for the purpose of adjusting property rights and so that the husband could avoid a jail sentence.

            If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • An unrevoked agreement for separation under which the spouses are living apart precludes either from obtaining a divorce for desertion. The rule, as stated, contemplates that the agreement must be unrevoked, and that the spouses must be living apart under the agreement, and there are certain modifications of the rule stated, as, for instance, that where the cause of action had fully accrued at the time of the agreement, the rule would not apply, and where the sole purpose of the agreement is to adjust the property rights of the parties the legal consequences flowing from the prior desertion are not affected. It is also stated that when the agreement is obtained without the real concurrence of the other party, it does not operate as a bar to divorce on the ground of desertion. The general rule is admitted, and while the courts do not commit themselves to the exceptions or distinctions stated, they do think the circumstances of each case determine, and should determine, the action of the court in passing upon a particular case.
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Monday, April 14, 2014

Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Child Custody Spousal Support

If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.  Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Xavier v. Xavier
Facts:

            Appellant husband challenged a decision of the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia), which granted appellee wife a divorce. The decision also awarded the wife sole custody of their children, awarded her both spousal and child support, equitably distributed the marital property, and awarded the wife attorney's fees.

            If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • In the context of a dissolution of marriage action, cruelty consists of anything that tends to bodily harm and thus renders cohabitation unsafe or involves danger of life, limb or health.
  • In cases where a court has a choice between a cause of action for a "no fault" divorce and a cause seeking to fix fault, nothing in Virginia law states that the cause without fault to either party should be chosen. Virginia law does not require courts to give precedence to no-fault grounds over fault grounds. Instead, when a trial court faces dual or multiple grounds for divorce, it can exercise its own discretion in selecting the ground upon which to grant the divorce.
  • For equitable distribution purposes a trial court may consider facts demonstrating marital fault outside the parameters of the fault ground for an a vinculo divorce.
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Sunday, April 13, 2014

Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Alimony Settlement Agreement

If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.  Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Patrick v. Patrick
Facts:

            A husband was obligated to pay alimony to his wife under a settlement agreement that was incorporated in a decree of divorce a mensa et thoro in Prince William. He subsequently filed a bill of complaint that sought a divorce a vinculo matrimonii because of the wife's adultery and to set aside the prior decree's alimony provisions on the grounds of fraud, coercion, and duress. The trial court sustained the wife's demurrer to the bill and dismissed the suit. On appeal, the court reversed and remanded. Because the decree a mensa et thoro granted a legal separation but did not sever the marital bond, it was not a final adjudication of support rights and the trial court had jurisdiction to modify the decree's alimony provisions to meet changed conditions, including the power to revoke the provisions if subsequent to the decree the wife forfeited her right to support through misconduct. The first decree, which was entered on the ground of the husband's desertion, barred a later divorce suit on the ground of adultery. The husband was estopped from avoiding the agreement's property settlement provisions because he had not acted promptly and could not escape the agreement's burdens but keep its benefits.

            If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • The marital status is not affected by a decree of legal separation, that is, a divorce a mensa et thoro; and where the wife has been forced by her husband's misconduct to seek a decree of separation, there still continues the duty, arising out of the marital status, to provide his wife with a reasonably sufficient support considering his circumstances and her needs at any given time, provided her right to support has not been forfeited by her misconduct, which forfeiture may be for misconduct prior to the decree for separation or subsequent to the entry of such decree.
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:


These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Saturday, April 12, 2014

Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Constructive Desertion Cruelty

If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.  Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Justus v. Justus

Facts:

            A wife filed a complaint in Prince William against the husband, seeking a divorce on the grounds of constructive desertion and cruelty. She also sought spousal support and attorney's fees. The husband requested a divorce on the grounds of adultery. The parties represented that they had resolved the issue of equitable distribution of the marital estate.

            If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • Desertion as a ground of divorce does not depend on who actually leaves the family home. It means desertion of the marital relationship. Desertion may be "constructive," for cruelty by one party, which results in the other party's enforced separation, is tantamount to desertion by the party performing the cruel acts.
  • Cruelty consists of anything that tends to bodily harm and thus renders cohabitation unsafe or involves danger of life, limb or health. The words "bodily hurt" include any course of conduct which leads to serious nervous or mental disease. Constructive desertion occurs where the conduct of the other spouse has caused conditions in the marital home to be intolerable to the point that the affected spouse has to leave. Mere inability to live together in peace and harmony does not constitute a fault-based ground for divorce. 
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Friday, April 11, 2014

Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Settlement Agreement

If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.  Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Jardon v. Jardon  
Facts:

            Appellant wife and cross-appellant husband both challenged an order of the Circuit Court of Prince William County (Virginia) modifying cross-appellant's child support obligation, which obligation was originally established by a settlement agreement incorporated into the parties' divorce decree.

            If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • Applying Va. Code Ann. § 20-109.1, incorporation of a child support agreement into a decree renders the terms of the agreement so incorporated enforceable as a decree of the court. Pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 20-108, however, the divorce court retains continuing jurisdiction after a final decree of divorce has been entered, to modify its decree with respect to the maintenance of minor children. This power to modify child support is not affected by the prior act of affirming, ratifying, and incorporating into the divorce decree the child support agreement between the husband and wife...
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:


These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Thursday, April 10, 2014

Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Adultery Equitable Distribution Spousal Support

If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.  Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Hooper v. Hooper
Facts:

            A husband and wife filed exceptions to a commissioner's report, which recommended that the wife be granted a divorce on the ground of adultery, made an equitable distribution of the parties' property in Prince William, and awarded the wife spousal support.

            If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • One of the keys to a decision as to whether adultery has been proven lies in what objective reasons, if any, can be articulated to explain why the two people in question ended up together. Thus, in determining whether clear and convincing evidence supports a finding of adultery, the courts consistently review the record to determine not only whether the evidence merely establishes suspicious conduct, but also whether a credible explanation existed for the circumstances.
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Cruelty Custody Alimony

If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.  Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Andrews v. Andrews
Facts:

            Plaintiff husband brought suit against defendant wife for a divorce on the ground of desertion and sought the permanent and absolute custody of the parties' infant child. In a cross-bill, the wife charged the husband with cruelty, and sought custody and alimony. The wife challenged the decree of the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia) that dismissed her cross-bill and granted a divorce and primary custody to the husband.

            If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • The welfare of the infant is the primary, paramount, and controlling consideration of the court in all controversies between parents over the custody of their minor children. All other matters are subordinate. The rule is to be administered with as much consideration for the tender ties of affection of the parents as possible under the circumstances, and especially when each parent is shown to be a fit and proper custodian of the child.
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Monday, April 7, 2014

Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Adultery Spousal Support

If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.  Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Holder v. Holder
Facts:
            Appellant wife sought review of a judgment from the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia), which affirmed the findings of the commissioner and granted appellee husband a divorce on the grounds of adultery and denied the wife spousal support. The wife also sought review of the trial court's determinations of the value of the marital estate and the distribution of the marital assets.

            If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • To prove adultery, the evidence of another spouse's extramarital sexual intercourse must be "clear and convincing." While a court's judgment cannot be based upon speculation, conjecture, surmise, or suspicion, adultery does not have to be proven beyond all doubt. Rather, the evidence must produce in the mind of the trier of facts a firm belief or conviction as to the allegations of adultery sought to be established. The trial court must value the parties' marital property before making an equitable distribution. Va. Code Ann. § 20-107.3. The parties bear the burden of providing the trial court with sufficient evidence from which it can value their property.
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Sunday, April 6, 2014

Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Spousal Support Custody

If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.  Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Bennett v. Bennett
Facts:

            Appellant wife sought review of an order of the Circuit Court, Prince William (Virginia), which granted divorce and custody to appellee husband and denied the wife spousal support in her action for dissolution.

            If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • To establish the charge of adultery the evidence must be full and satisfactory---the judicial mind must be convinced affirmatively. The proof should be strict, satisfactory, and conclusive. The testimony of a hired detective in such cases shall be carefully scrutinized and acted on with great caution. A charge of adultery is one of a criminal offense and especially and uniquely damaging to the reputation of the party charged. The general and widely recognized presumption of innocence must be indulged against it, and, while it is not required to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, as in a criminal proceeding, the evidence must be at least clear and positive and convincing. Raising a considerable or even strong suspicion of guilt is not enough.
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:


These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Friday, April 4, 2014

Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Custody Best Interests

If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.  Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Edwin v. Edwin

Facts:

            Plaintiff husband appealed a decision from the Circuit Court of Prince William (Virginia), which, in the parties' divorce proceedings, entered judgment on the issues of custody, support, and grounds for divorce.

            If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • The court must consider the factors in Va. Code Ann. § 20-124.3 in deciding what custody arrangement is in the child's best interests, including: The age and physical and mental condition of the child, giving due consideration to the child's changing developmental needs; The age and physical and mental condition of each parent; The relationship existing between each parent and each child, giving due consideration to the positive involvement with the child's life, the ability to accurately assess and meet the emotional, intellectual and physical needs of the child; The needs of the child, giving due consideration to other important relationships of the child, including but not limited to siblings, peers and extended family members; The role which each parent has played and will play in the future, in the upbringing and care of the child.
  • In child support cases, Va. Code Ann. § 20-108.1 provides a rebuttable presumption that the amount of child support indicated by the guidelines contained in Va. Code Ann. § 20-108.2 is the correct support amount. A court must consider the factors in Va. Code Ann. § 20-108.1(B) in deciding whether to deviate from the presumptive amount. These factors include imputed income to a party who is voluntarily unemployed or under employed. Any child support award must be based on circumstances existing at the time the award is made.
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Constructive Desertion Cruelty

If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.  Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Holder v. Holder
Facts:

            Plaintiff wife filed a suit for divorce from defendant husband on the grounds of willful desertion, constructive desertion, and cruelty. The husband demurred to the wife's amended bill of complaint, asserting the wife failed to state a cause of action for a divorce from bed and board on the ground of cruelty. The Circuit Court of Prince William, Virginia, sustained the demurrer. The wife appealed.

            If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

            The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • Va. Code Ann. § 20-95 authorizes a decree of divorce from bed and board for cruelty, reasonable apprehension of bodily hurt, willful desertion or abandonment. In reality, there are only two grounds for a divorce from bed and board, desertion and cruelty, because cruelty and reasonable apprehension of bodily hurt are so closely related in the matter of proof and effect. Severe mental cruelty, accompanied by malice or actual menace, may be sufficient grounds for a divorce under Va. Code Ann. § 20-95. There may be cases in which the husband, without violence, actual or threatened, may render the marriage state impossible to be endured. There may be angry words, coarse and abusive language, humiliating insults, and annoyances in all the forms that malice can suggest, which may as effectually endanger life or health as personal violence, and which, therefore, will afford grounds for relief by the court.
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.

Our Phone #

Prince William Virginia

Prince William 703-278-0405
Click here to call us toll free Sris Lawyer Click here to call us toll free

Social Icons

Powered by Blogger.