Friday, February 28, 2014
Divorce Attorneys Prince William Virginia Adultery
If you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or
about to go through a divorce in Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax
Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to speak with a
lawyer today about your Divorce Case. An
attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.
We will do our absolute best to help you get the
best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to
assist you with this matter.
Davison v. Davison
Facts:
Appellant ex-wife challenged a decree of the Circuit
Court of Prince William (Virginia), which granted appellee ex-husband a divorce
on the ground of adultery.
If you are facing a Divorce case in Virginia, contact a
SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can
reach us at 888-437-7747
Holdings:
The
Virginia Court made the following holding:
- A decree confirming a
commissioner's report is presumed to be correct and will not be disturbed
if it is reasonably supported by substantial, competent and credible
evidence. While
a court's judgment cannot be based upon speculation, conjecture, surmise
or suspicion, adultery does not have to be proven beyond all doubt. The
evidence must be clear and convincing, based upon proven facts and
reasonable inferences drawn from these facts.
If
you are dealing with a divorce in Virginia or about to go through a divorce in
Virginia, contact us for help.
We have client meeting
locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach
Fredericksburg Lynchburg.
Contact our law firm today to
speak with a lawyer today about your Divorce Case. An attorney from our firm will do his best to
help you.
We will do our absolute best
to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our
law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.
Disclaimer:
These summaries are provided by the
SRIS Law Group. They represent the
firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for
their authoritative content.